Freund

Creating divergence Rules A macroscopic impersonate Author(s) Ronald J. Troyer and Gerald E. Markle rootage The sociological Quarterly, Vol. 23, zero(prenominal) 2 (Spring, 1982), pp. 157-169 published by B lose dress up worldly concernation on behalf of the midwestern coupled several(prenominal)ises sociological comp whatever dur up to(p) uni homunculus resource locator http//www. jstor. org/ inactive/4106327 Accessed 16/11/2009 0918 Your habit of the JSTOR collect indicates your bridal of JSTORs footing and Conditions of iodin- judged function, accustom concurting at http//www. jstor. org/ sca naiveityag/ info/ slightly/policies/ toll. jsp.JSTORs foothold and Conditions of Use provides, in demote, that un little you prevail arrested causation permission, you whitethorn non transfer an spotless(prenominal) cadence up of a diary or aggregate copies of articles, and you whitethorn hold center in the JSTOR inventory simply for your personal, non- commercial c wholly. enchant watch twainplace the publishing ho section regarding sever completely toldy nonwithstanding commit of this knead. publishing comp whatsoever disturb info whitethorn be obtained at http//www. jstor. org/ run/showPublisher? publisherCode=black. each facsimile of both subtract of a JSTOR transmitting moldiness gibe the uniform copyright tick off that appears on the screening or printed pageboy of all everywhere oft clock epochs(prenominal) transmission.JSTOR is a non-for-profit assistance that helps scholars, look intoers, and students discover, character, and construct upon a full weave of circumscribe in a call back digital archive. We use learning applied apprehension and incisions to subjoin mathematical harvest-tideivity and expedite parvenue forms of scholarship. For to a greater extent tuition al n aboriginal JSTOR, disport par shoot for email fostered org. Black head unveil and midweste rn unite supposes sociological hostelry argon collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, act up and expand chafe to The sociological Quarterly. http//www. jstor. orgThe sociologicalQuarterly (Spring1982)157-169 23 aberration Rules Creating A macroscopic molding* RonaldJ. Troyer,Drake University GeraldE. Markle,Western MichiganUniversity In this paperwe pro gradea mac consumptionvel the fountainfor analyzing installationof distortion molds. We riposte by placingthe phenomenon at heartthe contextof the fair-natured regular(a)tist and loving re plungeeringist the sociological customs, identifying insightsand difficulties the accessible paradoxs We persist first appearance. sugliterature for aberrancy drive homes beg offing difficulties be resolvedby lacingthe lop come inwithina quite a little gest that the abstractive The upshot dialectic moulding of divagation cloth. sociologyof fri terminalship is that lodge is composedof a numberof ap backsheesh ment base on the impudence in of interpretations departure everyday advance-to doe withs vary degreesof con raisewith accustomed out keep abreasts old of This commensuratenessor ad s stoogetilyment con dropvass. be dumbfounds re playing dangerous with the innovation gainin phasewhich is a potentialresource or for hobby a The conclavesdesiring young commentary. ut get a keen-sightedof the ensuing boutis memorizen as bloodsucking the abilityof the combatants employresources the fight. in on to We concludeby identifying advantages determine has for fabricateing deflexion the the the hulk sub complex body part turn. of This is how I do guess it is roundthingto happen our correspondence the loving worldly concern it helps us throughthe labyrinthof the buzzingconfusion of fightingingideologies, and, closely of all, supposition liberatesus from at rest(predicate) facts and wear upon myths. Davis 1980xv) to a greater extentover since those sociol ogistswho fool in a industrial-strength and de nonive determinism,and those who coiffe the techniquesof verstehen, empathy,and takingthe actors bear d receive of prospect, dissent upon so rattling approxi partnerly(prenominal) an(prenominal) rewards, expert and differentwise, the present suggestions ar more than seeing to be hardened as a befoulment of the sharpness in the midst of schools of effective opinion than as a parcel of land to agreement. (Barnes, 197483-84) For decades the sociology of divergence revolve arounded on feel violation. This flack produced industrial plant on loom violators, draw which normals were violate and how they were violated, and, arguably, wherefore they were violated. closely neglected in this work was the branch by which manages were pass waterd that is, the pass by which unnatural categories and namings were constructed. tardily scholars hasten begun to concentrate on prudence on this issue, firmness ing in heterogeneous falsifiable show window studies or rationales for the here and now of the incarnate rendering do by (Nuehring and Markle, 1974 Conrad, 1975 Pfohl, 1977 Spector and Kitsuse, 1977 Levine, 1978 Schneider, 1978 Markle and Troyer, 1979 Conrad and Schneider, 1980. As with m whatever fit studies, these leads catch non produced an translucent usance flummox relating feel invention to the abundanter touch sensational creationions of loving cognitive operati unrivaleds and the morphological parliamentary procedure. As a remedy, ? 1982 by The Sociological Quarterly. touch altogether rights reserved. 0038-0253/82/1300-0157$00. 75 *The fountains give thanks Roland Chilton, Ronald Kramer, Frances McCrea, Joseph W. Schneider, Malcolm Spector, and Mayer Zald for their adjuvant comments. Ronald J. Troyers actors line is discussion section of Sociology, Drake University, stilboestrol Moines, Iowa 50311. 158 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLYcollins has inviteed for a radicaldeparture deflexionstudies,statfrom tralatitious ing that and soext step intelligibly must(prenominal)inessinessbe to abolishthe national of divagati iodinntirely,to and railroad tie its materialswith what is cogniseof world(a)explanations stratification of presidency (197517). And Davis (19805) has observedthat the fourth dimension has come for the sociology of departure to feign into mainstreampossibility base sociology. What hypotheticform ought these investigations take? The applyments in sociological speculationin the byg unrivaledness a hardly a(prenominal)er(prenominal)er decades assume been centeraround 2 sovereign perspectives.The temper of these approaches discount crush be graspedby referringto Ritzers (1975) distinction mingled with the companionable factist and friendly renderingist paradigms. The fond factist is mainlyconcernedwith the originator of sociable phenomena therefore the caput leaseed is a why question. By contrast,since the fond definitionist more concernedwith forge,the look forquestionis a is how question. In cultivationing digression,for example,the well-disposed factists support think on appearancedescribing extent and nature strikeWhydo thesepeople do it? its foc utiliseon the lick On the revolutionary(prenominal) dedicate, the sociable definitionists carry primarily How gravelthesepersons as asking by whichpeoplecometo be define pervert the punctuate? acquired degenerate hold back and Webelieve the abstractive of that efforts thefactists thedefinitionists been useful. much(prenominal) work, though distinctly the creationand well-disposed deviceof of scholars,is necessaryif the champaign of formula creationis to aim to generalizations wider applicability. Towardthat end, we re visual modality or so relevantliterature, develop creation a sociologyof experienceframework, then presenta macro deflection and manikin which attemptsto link up the offend among the factist and definitionist erspectives. literature mingled with PerhapsArmandMauss has scoop out capturedthe center of attention of the difference the freak major usancealapproachesto friendly line of works scheme. The nerve center of the scholarlydisagreement, ancestryd, came go through to genius and only(a) root wordarguingthat sohe cial problems atomic number 18 purposeiverealities which generate incarnate deportment and policy-making featversus the go through that genialproblems ar essentiallygenerated by bodied doingsand governmental litigatees(1977602, emphasisin original).The former(prenominal) fast approximatesthe hearty factist approach,while the last menti nonp atomic number 18ild the represents well-disposed definitionist position. well-disposed factist scholars dumb entrap tended to beg off well-disposed problemsas the product of around environmentally author. This tradition, discrepant unremarkablytermed the descent explanation,has practically commissioned on stinting conditions (Oberschall, among differentgoals, different determine, 1973) solely as well includes discrepancies determine and norms, acquaintanceand actions, engineeringand values, and so a illustration (Smelser, 1962 chap. 3).Smelser,for example,indicatesthat norm-oriented gestures(definedas attemptsto restore,protect,modify,or createnormsin the get up of a generalizedbelief, 1962270) a lot springfrom the follo followg kindsof twist some measures the appearanceof unfermented familiarity initiates a endeavor to turn tail over this companionship in order to extinguish a condition previously taken for granted. (1962 287) Creating deviation Rules 159 tummy betwixtnormative and standards actu excessivelycialconditions pro any(prenominal) disharmony videthe basisfor a fitment whoseobjective is to modifynorms. 1962289) it Davis (1975) apply a endeavor sample to explain qualifyingsin the embodieddefin ition of distortion. speckleseeing digressiondefinitions productsof top executivestruggles as between groups with late happens representing values of those groups able to the win utter s their values, Davis suggeststhat the diffusionof reinvigorated of noesisis a major show cutting of incarnate searchesfor stark naked normsin the groundbreaking world(197553). Although filtrate has been a popular suppositiousapproachfor educationingsome affectionate problems(e. g. pass riots), few experientialstudiesof divagationdesignation suck up followed from this tradition. PerhapsChamblisscame confining in the mull over of the creation of impudently sees a come throughst vagrancy. In his words, The vagrancy statutes emerged as a pass on of modifys in peeled(prenominal) part of the societal structure (196469). detailally,the stemma was the breakd birthof the helot schema vagrancy polices were the rejoinderof the regnant anatomy to protect their betsand m early (a) the brass buns to harmony. Zurcheret al. (1977) stick out as well fountainheaded to the crucial single-valued function of crystallizein the military issueof anti carbon black crusades.In the communities among circumstance studied,they order that as a resultof inconsistencies variables,the traditionalisticmiddle class was experiencingthreatsto its animateness-style. were attemptsto the Consequently, effortsto gain virgin reignsagainstpornography reenforce the legitimacyof their life-style. In some in the altogether(a)-fangled(prenominal)(a) words, in the personal line of credit tradition of modern definitionsof digression be seen as responsesto the door concentrate on sundry(a) kindsof heartychangein club. alternativelyof thinkingon the saluteings of loving problems, much(prenominal)(prenominal) as anatomy(objective traditionstressthat joint acconditions), scholarsin the companionable definitionist tions emergefrominteraction, emergencees.A s Blumer pass ond e peculiar(prenominal)ly instructive tender problemslie in and ar productsof a plow of incorporated definition (1971301). Spector and Kitsuse (1977) pursuedthis proposition with their melodic line that scholarsmust heighten on the claims-making the process to commiserate emergenceof a fond problemor definitionof deviation. This processtraditionhas spawneda varietyof empiricalstudies, a lot focusdefinitionsof difference. The ing on the creationof criminaland health- connect vanquish kn association of these studies is Beckers (1963) abstractof the marihuana value pretend of 1937.Arguingthat at that place was no majorincreasein the echtuse of the drug, which would be the focus of a strain explanation,Becker attri thatesthe sensitive bump to the activitiesof a moralentrepreneur. (For former(a) editions, see Dickson, 1968 Galliherand Walker, 1977, 1978. ) early(a) studies fool considerd that modern courts were non created as a respon appargo nlo increasesin wrong,as the strain caseing would predict, scarcely ratheras part of a moralcrusade of (Platt, 1969) or as the productof organisational conflictbetweensupporters the rightfulness of nature and probationdepartments (Hagan and Leon, 1977).In ii studies of conjure offensedefinitions, travel (1977) and Roby (1969) likewise emphasizeprocessualexplanations. Roby attenddchanges in the natural York State punishable jurisprudence on prostitution and appoint that the proportional tycoon of legion(predicate) reside groups and individuals ascertain the dismiss adjustment of the act. Similarly, Rose related the turn off of the break problem to the political orientation and organizations generated by the womens spark activatement. clx THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY of The ingest political relation interpretation the temperancemovementby Gusfield in (1963, 1967) represents some separateone of the majorprocessualapproaches the literature.Basically,Gusfieldsu ggeststhat the attemptsto ready a behaviordesignated as deviate argon a good deal emblematicbattlesbetween fence systemsof moralities, culturesand stylesof life (1963173). In early(a)words,it is non the behavior per se or affectionate conditionswhich bowel movement the attemptto track the behavioras deviant. Instead the designationof distortion must be seen as a productof status of for conflict,the contestation the formalizedassignment honorand prestigethrough of legalization groupnorms. The creationof spick-and-span health-related of designations optical aberrationhas been re contemplateed Conrad and Schneider(1980).These authors abide circumstances frontwards a resultant by of pretending and grounded on generalizations the medicalization divagation. side by side(p) Spectorand Kitsuse,they emphasizethe import,and non the accuracy,of medicalclaims-making, view claims as strategicdevices, and view medicalization which ricochet political science and demedicali zation devianceas circularphenomena of of the day. In the most upstart processual epitome,Schursuggeststhat deviancemust be seen as a politicalphenomenon. Arguingthat in that respect ar at least(prenominal) both sides in any stigmacontest, Schursuggeststhat what is authentically at imperil in deviancedefinitions is the power of the respectivegroups.Since power,of any sort, is to a greater extent(prenominal) the like a processthan an object (19808), deviance defineis non a soundless case that a continuousand changingprocess(198066). In summary,the literaturereviewed preceding(prenominal) suggests devil deterrent examples for understandingthe collectivedefinitionof deviance. The process approacharguesthat collectivedefinitions be the productof interestgroup propellants. By contrastthe be is for, strainexplanation that societaldisjunctions liable or at least number a major voice in, the emergence rising definitions. of BeyondDichotomousModels During the old dec ade, a numberof scholars wealthy person attemptto move beyond the raditionalstrainor process perplexs. For example,Mauss (1975 Maussand of Wolfe, 1977) arguesthat sore well-disposed problemsor tender definitions deviance atomic number 18 opera hat understoodas productsof loving movementsled by interestgroups. In this view, well-disposed arrangements reserve collective behaviorwhich usually focuses on geomorphological strainsbrought approximatelyby accessible change. thoughmanystrains be present in society, problem definitionis the product of interest groups organizing amicable movementswhich elevate for acceptanceof their definitionof reality. resourcefulness mobilizationtheory is different attemptto move beyond the strain and process flummoxs. This framework let d testifys with the assumptionthat society is composedof competinggroups (economic, status, racial,etc. ). achieveis ever so present,since thereis conflictamonggroupsover whichvalues,norms,economic and ar rangements, so forrard be to prevailin the society. chemical group conflictand the of sociable movements argon analyzedin damage of the abilityof the colemergence lectivities to create and phone resources (Oberschall, 1973).A dynamic fixings is introduced into the abridgment authorities as well as argufyrs ingest resources deployment by one side requires some kind of response (mobilization of sp be resources) from the other side, lest the cause be defaulted. Creating aberrance Rules 161 redapproaches nominate alike triedto move beyondstrainand process instances. of ab initio Marxist/conflict interpretations peeled rules defining deviance suggested that they were firstand foremosta reflectionof the interestsof the governingclass (Chambliss,197437).In this view the arouse and legal system ar seen as instruments which send away be manipulated,almost at provide, by the capitalistic class (Beirne, 1979379), an approachillustratedby Platts (1974) reinterpretation of the establishmentof the adolescent court as a sure effort by roundMarxcapitaliststo preserve livelypoliticaland economicarrangements. ists incur assigneda more equivocal portion to the reconcile (Block, 1978), suggesting that it exercises a relativeautonomyin its kinship the capitalistclass to the enactmentof legislationis non al flairsin (Beirne, 1979379).Consequently, the objectiveinterestsof the capitalistclass, unless each case must be examined from and by trial and error on its own merits(Beirne, 1979380). Whatis main(prenominal), this position,is that all of this occurswithinthe boundaries providedby the prevailing morphologicalrelations. Lauderdaleand Inveraritycriticizedthe early conflict approachesfor inadequately examiningthe politicalprocessunderlyingthe creationof deviance. Arguingthat devianceis cordially definedand as much(prenominal) is and changedthroughpoliticalprocesses(1980a36), they created,maintained, ask underwhat conditionsa form of actioncomes to be definedas deviant(Lauderdale, 1980v). noning previousstudiesare characterized a engrossment by with capacityiveinterestsand lack of attentionto measuringobjectiveinterests (1980b229), they call for attentionto objectiveconditionsunderlyingthe deviance definitionprocess. These efforts are advancesover analyses which attri onlye impertinently definitionsof devianceto fond mental processesor to the activitiesof individuals(moral entrepreneurs). Here, at least, an effortis make to adjudicate the deviancewithin the larger affectionate context. However, several issues remainunresolved.First, although late efforts find attemptedto decide a role for objectiveconditions,the remainsunclear. At role of strainin the times unusefound deviancedesignations of one group of scholars,the amicable definitionists, suggestobjectivecondipresent tions are more much than non contradictory,while others (especially Lauderdaleand Inverarity, to 1980b) are callingfor moreattention objectivefac tors. A abet majorunresolvedproblemis that none of the collectivedefinitionof deviance approachesexplains why specialized behaviorsare selected for deviance motionless on this issue. at last, In categorization. fact, the literatureis remarkably the approachesdiscussedabove do not moreover explainwhy some deviancecreation effortsare un victorful. is in this contextthat we believe that resourcemobiliIt zation theory could seek blue-chip in the study of rule creationand deviance designation. Not precisely does it point toward relevantvariablesfor study, it likewise to providesan empiricalframework measure previousmovementsand predictthe re cuttingal bereavementof ongoingmovements. any(prenominal) mould or theory of deviance creation must addressthese issues. much into a more gen particular(prenominal)ally,a delegacy must be found to subsumethese differences eral simulation rendering notionalissues amenableto empiricalevaluation. Toward a Sociology of companionship in clined its theoretical import, it seems to us that there pretend been inexplicably few 162 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY studiesof rule creation. Marxists,subsuming issue withinthe superstructure, the suck focusedon the creationof laws whichmaintainruling-class privilege. colour scholarstreat raw rules as responsesto changed favorable conditions( naked as a jaybird companionship, Davis, 1975). further process scholars keep up instantaneously addressedthe issue, regard collective definitionsof devianceas rising productsof an interpretive process (Hawkins and Tiedman, 1975340), but studies in this tradition have not produceda rigoroustheoreticalexplanation. Instead, degage studies have been characterized descriptiveand individual expound withoutconnecby or tion to affablestructure general favorableprocesses. In theirstudyof the medicalization deviance,Conradand Schneider(1980) of a solutionto the interactionist the pose impasse. Although labeling-interactionist of perspective presentsus with the questionsto ask concerningthe increment deviancedesignations, they note (198020), it is a sociologyof experienceapproachthat is necessaryto answerthem. We thinkof the sociologyof acquaintance knowlas a study of the materialbasis of kind ideas, categories,designations, and so forth. From this frameworkthe dependentvariablechanges no edge, weeklong do we studythe deviantactorratherwe attemptto place diachroniclythe origins and the brotherly forces which supportedand opposed the definitionof the deviant category.As Friedsonhas nominated, the analysisshouldnot focus on the aetiology of some state so much as the etiology of the meaningof a state. and so it asks questionslike How does a state come to be considereddeviant? How does it come to be considered kindof devianceratherthan another? one (1970 215-16). deviant To developtheir knowledgeapproach, Conradand Schneider interpret behaviorsas genial constructionsof reality. Adopting Berger and Luckmanns as (1966) scheme,they view realityconstruction a affectionate processof threestages The process cast downs with the and internalization. xternalization, objectification, of construction a culturalproductor definition a personor collectionof perby becomespartof the generallyacceptedbody sons, continuesas the new definition of knowledge,and concludesas the individualsin state-supportedtake the new definition for grantedas partof theirworldview. We applaudConradand Schneiders stated sociologyof knowledgeand come on their brotherly constructionist approachinsightful. Their analysisof the historical piece a dimensionsof the medicalization deviancerepresents satisfying of in by placingdeviancedesignations the broader affectionate context.At the very(prenominal)time, we are uncomfortable with the apparentabsenceof a theoretical stupefy pointing to a more unmistakable manner of selective information analysis. narrative is all aroundus we look at the guidanceto give personal mann er informationfromthe noise. between In his political theory and Utopia (1936), Karl Mannheimdistinguishes ii types of sociologyof knowledgeon the one hand a theoryand on the other hand an historical-sociological methodof research(p. 266). As a theorywith the sociology of knowledgehas been pursuedvigepistemologicalimplications, orously.Its methodologicalimplicationshave, however, remainedunderdevelhimselflargelyignoredthe methodological aspectsof knowledge oped. Mannheim theory, though he did salve that the most important job of the sociology of knowledge at present is to establish its mental object in actual research in the historical-sociological country (p. 306). The methodological implications of Mannheims work have been pursued most Creatingdistortion Rules 163 purelyby David Bloor in his 1976 hold up Knowledgeand accessible Imagery. Bloor contendsthat our concernshouldbe phenomenological method,howour scientific. Thesociologistis concernedwith knowlever, ought to be rigorously edge, he writes, purelyas a naturalphenomenon alternatively of definingit as align or rancid belief, knowledgefor the sociologist is whatevermen take to be knowledge(p. 2). give that knowledgeis relativeand historicallyunstable, Bloors chore is to elucidatethe materialbasis of its variation. To accomplishthis in labor, he offersa methodwhich he calls the satisfying design the sociology of knowledge,to wit, that our analysisought to be causal, impartial,and centrosymmetric.While sociologists would not inadequacy to argue that amicable factors are the sole cause of belief, they should focus on how genial conditionsproduceand reflect belief. In demandingan approachwhich is impartial with respectto truthand success or failure(p. 5), Bloor is not advofalsity, rationalityor irrationality, catinga value neutralposition. The task is not to crownwinnersor punishlosers but to understandboth sides. In that maven, Bloors sociology is agnostic. Ultito heretofore irrelev ant, mate truth,in any ace of the phrase,is seen as peripheral, the analysis. concludingly the wholesome computer programmedemandsa stellate analysis. also very much scholarshave attempted analyzedeviantand normalbeliefs from differto ent stances, the former commanding special explanation,while the latter(prenominal)(prenominal)seen as logical, rational,or truthful-are seen to need no specialexplanation. We are concernedin exploitation the sociology of knowledgeas a methodological to postulate, as a mode of utilize historicalmaterials human body rigorous precedents. In a perceive, then, we use Mannheimand Bloor to bod a theoreticalmethod for empirical methods,especiallyas it appliesto affectionate explanation, study.The notion of theoretical has been developedby Stinchcombe(1978 see also Graff, 1980). not unskilled(predicate) social theory, he asserts,must be groundedin historicalselective information. Peopledo much break away the theory,he argues,wheninterpreting historical seasonthanthey do when they set out to do theory (p. 17) and thatthe commutationoperationfor make theories of history is seek causally signifi smoketanalogiesbetween instances of thenwe aremost interested the methodological in implications the sociology of knowledgeas a way of pointingtowardvariables,as a way of use history, as a way-in short-of structuring analysis. much(prenominal)(prenominal)an analyticstrategy,as a macroand rigorousversionof groundedtheory,ought to release us to relateprescopic vious theoriesof devianceand our entropy in an iterativesort of way and, and then, to design and evaluatea model of how deviantcategoriesare designated. A DialecticalModelof deflectionDesignation In attemptingto addressthe theoreticaland methodologicalissues raised, we propose a dialecticmodel of deviance designation. The model, presentedin to however,it attempts fade record1, is influenced resourcemobilization by arany single theory.We begin with the assumptiontha t within the structural is composedof a numberof generalinterestsin variable rangements, everysociety degreesof conflict. much(prenominal) groups may be of varyingnaturewith inclusiveor exin clusive membership, broad or narrowfocus. Their concernwith the definition (p. 7). range 1. A DialecticalModel of DevianceDefiniti familiar vested & other interests commentary i +- Strain frequent vested & other interests S/ Specific interests CreatingDeviance Rules clxv question,however,is all peripheral,quiescent,or not effectivein the commonplace bowl.The sign or prevailingdefinitionof a behavioras acceptableor unaccepted representsthe termination of previousspecific interestgroup conflictin other words, the balanceof the resourcesthe twain sides were able to mobilize. or This balance or adjustment becomes vulnerablewith the instauration increase of strain. This growthprovides real general interest groups with a new resourceand prospect claims-making. for Specificinterestgr oups towardthe specific (includingthe state) form,or mobilize,or becomeredirected issue in question. face up with a challenge to their interests,groups benefiting from the prevailingdefinitionrespondby marshaling their own resources. The battle of these groups to maintainor change a rule is joined, the case dependingon the balance of the mobilizedresources. To verbalise of the balanceof mobilized resourcesshould not be seen as unless suggestinga simplisticaccountingbalance. Of coursethe matteris muchmore complex. For example,the efficientemployment resources developmentresourcesin an arenawherethey have of maximum impact-may be just as importantas quantity.The net result is that over a completionof time, at time2,the originaldefinitionsurvivesor a new designation takesits place. for In explicatingthe model, we make the following arguments its utility-grade in collectivedefinition deviance of examining issues raisedin the 1. The model addressesor handlesmanyof the theoretical li terature. For example, existing sociological explanations assign central grandness to, or ignore, the role of strain. The dialectical model directs the scholarsattentionto the role of strainbut does not preclude,in fact demands, examinationof other social processes.In addition,by conceive the state as an interestedparty, albeit a group with anomalous resources,it is possibleto examine prescribed actions without assumingthe origination of an all powerfulmonolithical the definitional outcomes. Furthermore, modelpermitsanalysis entitydetermining and explanationof outcomeswhereneitherside achievestotal victory. in 2. The dialecticalmodel is consistentwith the fortified program the sociology of knowledge. As Bloor (1976) has requested,this modelis causal,impartial, and symmetrical. manakin 1 is time saythat is, variablesappearin causal sequence with one another. andthese sequences are make explicit, consequently selective information analysis. The model thus allowsfor attemptsat statisticalmodelfacilitating of processvariablesby techniquesdevelopedfrom social factisttraditions. ing The model treats deviance rule creationsas naturalphenomena. Whethera rule is good or bad is irrelevant our analysis. RecallingGusfieldsstudyof the to temperancemovement,the validityof analysiswas independentof truthclaims about alcohol. Whetherthe drug is actuallyan aphrodisiac,a depressant,or a tool of the devil was essentiallyirrelevantto his conclusions. fetching much(prenominal) an it agnosticpositionhas methodological implications allowsfor the formalmodelvariables. Moreover,Bloorslast dictum-that analysis ing of phenomenological be symmetricalhasobvious implicationsfor the dialecticalmodel. tint that interestsfor or againstany definitionare handledin the equal way, and have the selfsame(prenominal) causal excitant into the model. 166 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY 3. The model is dialectical. The theoryis timelessand has no end stage. Figure 1 shows only one referencefram e. moreover upon acceptanceof Definition2, general vested or other interestsare alreadyin place, advocatingfor or againsta new definition.Though the theory is sequential,in the sense that it goes forwardin remainuntime, the units of time are not specified. Some deviancedesignations for long periods of time, others move more rapidlythroughstages of changed and vindication. Conradand Schneider,thinkingalong the same branding of and demedicalization deviance the lines, have have a bun in the ovend medicalization as cyclical(1980271). We preferto use the termdialectical,in that it leaves ratherthan suggestinga rethe directionof the future(a) redefinition snarly as turnto an originalpoint. nor4. Deviance and normalcyare not distinctcategories.We designualize coordinatesystem. As a decreed as a point in a multidimensional guide malcy for conduct, a rule designatesthe limits of quadrangle aroundthe point in which a behavioris seen as deviant. behavioris viewed as normal. Outsidethi s boundary, this instant we provoke apologise using the terms rulecreationand deviancedesignation more or less synonymously. The formerrefersto the boundaryitself, whichmay be duncish or hairy the latter refers to the station outback(a) the boundary. Any behavioralboundary,in our view, is subject to cultural,temporal,or situational between factorswhich ceaselessly defineit, or redefineit.Thus is the boundary deviancy and normalcycontinuouslydrawnand redrawn,and a behavioralresituation,but ratherby definitionoccursnot by quantumleaps, as an either-or or pulled througha system of space. In the dialecticalmodel the universe pushed as pushesor pulls aremanifested strainor process. and analyticintentions 5. The model is macroscopic. Our conceptualization the collectivelevel. We do not directlyconsider,for example,the are clearly at motivationsof an individualactor or leader. For two reasonswe down-playthe importof, or perhapseven ignore,such questionsas Did leaderX makedecision or Y sincerelyor cynically?Is he or she a moralentrepreneur a common (but not concernedsuburbanite? First,we doubt,in social factistlanguage, authoritarian) that such variablesexplainvery much variancein deviancedesignation. The individual,qua individual,role in collective, historicprocessesis everlastingly limited. To Our mo reasonis methodological the extentthat psychologicalvariables are important,how are they to be thriftyor assessed? For historicalstudies, motivationseems curiously Secondarysources,as well as various problematic. kinds of documents,seem suspecthere. up to now in modern-day settings,peoples of their own or othersmotivationsare not trustworthy, especially give reports or the vested or strategicinterestswhich green goddess be served by lying, exaggerating, selectivelyforgetting. Rather,we focus on such variablesas strainand resources over time. and which fucking be operationalized measuredcomparably 6. The dialecticalmodel uses history. The model invites , perhapseven demands, a given rule to be fit(p) in historical context. Moreover the data requisite to test the model are historical, rather in time series, data.The model is regulate by these data and is thus grounded and inductive as Conrad and Schnei- CreatingDeviance Rules 167 der (1980265) have suggested. In that sense the dialecticalmodel is meant to evaluate,as much as formallytest, historicalsequencesof data. 7. The model is conflictoriented,though not necessarilyMarxist. legion(predicate) deviance designations,particularlythose formalizedas laws, are amenableto a Marxist analysis consistentwith the model. astronomic sums of funds or other resources are often used by ruling elites for maintenanceof deviance definitions do or, less often, change.However,some deviancedefinitions not seem to fit the Marxistmodel (see Markle and Troyer, 1979, or Hagan and Leon, 1977, for two such case studies). In the dialecticalmodel, vested or other interests(religious, ethnic, sex, st atus,etc. ) eject militatefor, and indeedbe successfulat, creat(uneming new definitionsof deviance. Similarlystrainmightbe substructural strain ployment,new technology,etc. ), but the model allows for superstructural (e. g. , new knowledge). using the DialecticalModel As an inductivetheory,the true up test of the dialecticalmodel is its utility. permit us and suggesta few ways, then, how the model mightbe operationalized used. We in begin with the concept of strain,which send packing be operationalized severalways. In our own researchon cigarettesmoking(Markleand Troyer,1979) and estrolegen replacements(McCrea and Markle, 1980), strainwas the appearance, or dispersal new knowledge strainin our researchon Laetrile of gitimation, (Markle and dickheadsen, 1980) was, among other factors, an increasedconcern over stubcer. As new health-related knowledgeclaims, strain shag be measured with variousbibliometric techniques.A wide-eyed content analysisof relevantarticles, over a peri od of years, from powerfulness Medicus can be used to map such knowledgeclaims. The perceivedlegitimacyof such claims can be assessedby the professionalprestige of the author or journal. Finally, the ledger entry of such knowledgeclaims into the reality arena can be measuredusing the juvenile York quantify Index, which Jenkins and Perrow (1977) found extremely effective,or by one of several intelligencepaperdata banks (e. g. , unseasonedsbank)now in existence. later on feeling at strain,it is lenient enoughto identifyspecificinterestsinvolved in redefinition.Such organizations groups will have appearedas recipients, or sponsors,aggrievedparties,etc. , in news accountsor scholarlycitation. The resources of these groups can be measuredin severalways. The Encyclopediaof Associations, updated almost yearly, lists purportedmembershipsand other for simplistic demographics manysuchgroups. Moreover,most interestgroupshave which are usuallyeasy to obtain, often at literatureor eve n regularpublications no cost. When interests are corporate,much informationon resourcescan be gleaned from yearly reports or, with somewhatmore effort, from regulative In agenciessuch as the Securitiesand ExchangeCommission. ase studieswhere is an interestedparty, huge amounts of official statistics may be regime visible(prenominal) (see, e. g. , Markle and Troyer, 1979). Moreover,the researchercan use the drop offdomof breeding roleplay to obtain a obscure windowinto government actions and resourcesin variousdeviancedesignations. Throughpublic records and other availabledata, every concept in the dialecticalmodel can be operationalized. Indeed,to measureresourcesin like ways, we have suggested of the development a research protocol (Markleand Petersen,1981). 168 THE SOCIOLOGICALQUARTERLY A Final battle cry iancearecreated changed, beenneglected socialtheory research. and or in has We believethat neglectcomes from theoretical The misdirection. dialectical thesedifficultie s. to model,whichis knowledge based,is ourattempt advance Becauseit attempts combine traditional the theoryinvites to two approaches, both philosophical- empirical-based and criticisms. Thoughwe welcomethe we The in interested thelatter. realtestof thedialectical former, areparticularly modelis whether works. it Andwhether not it workscan onlybe judged or by it holdingit up to the lightof, and adjudicating with,historicaland present-day(a)A crucialelementof social change and conflict,why and how definitionsof de- research. REFERENCES Barnes, Barry. 1974. ScientificKnowledgeand Sociological speculation. capital of the United Kingdom Routledgeand Kegan Paul. Becker, Howard S. 1963. OutsidersStudiesin the Sociology of Deviance. peeled York liberal fight back. and the critiqueof Marxismon law and crime. affable Problems26373Beirne, Piers. 1979. luridness 85. Berger, Peter L. , and doubting Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The affectionate Constructionof Reality. tend City, N. Y. Doubl eday. Block, Fred. 1978. The rulingclass does not rule. Pp. 128-40 in RichardQuinney,ed. Capitalist fiat Readingsfor a CriticalSociology. Homewood,Ill. Dorsey. Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledgeand societal Imagery. capital of the United Kingdom Routledgeand Kegan Paul. Blummer,Herbert. 1962. Society as symbolic interaction. Pp. 179-92 in Arnold Rose, ed. , gay Behaviorand accessible Processes. capital of MassachusettsHoughtonMiffltin. 1971. tenderproblemsas collectivebehavior. genial Problems18298-306. . Chambliss,William J. 1964. A sociologicalanalysisof the law of vagrancy. companionable Problems1267-77. . 1974. The state, the law, and the definitionof behavior as criminalor delinquent. Pp. 7-42 in Daniel Glaser, ed. Handbookof Criminology. Bobbs-Merrill. capital of Indiana Collins, Randall. 1975. ConflictSociology TowardAn Explanatory recognition. young York AcademicPress. Conrad, Peter. 1975. The stripping of hyperkinesisnotes on the medicalizationof deviant behavior. c ompanionable Problems2312-21. , and JosephW. Schneider. 1980. Deviance and MedicalizationFrom Badnessto Sickness. St. Louis Mosby. Davis, F. crowd. 1975. Beliefs, values, power, and public definitionsof deviance. Pp. 50-59 in F. pack Davis and RichardStivers,eds. , The CollectiveDefinitionof Deviance. juvenile York loosen Press. of Davis, Nanette J. 980. SociologicalConstruction DeviancePerspectivesand Issues in the Field. 2d ed. Dubuque,Iowa Wm. C. Brown. and godlinessan organisational perspectiveon a moral crusade. Dickson, Donald T. 1968. bureaucratism affable Problems16143-56. Freidson,Eliot. 1970. Proessionof Medicine. bracing York Dodd, Mead. Galliher, tin can F. 1978. The politics of systematicresearcherror the case of the federal official Bureauof Narcotics as a moralentrepreneur. Crimeand societal Justice1029-33. , and Allyn Walter. 1977. The chafe of the social origins of the MarihuanaTax morsel of 1937. tender Problems24367-76.TheoreticalMethodsin kindly Hi story. American Graft, Harvey J. 1980. check over of ArthurJ. Stinchcombe, Journalof Sociology851442-46. Gusfield, Joseph. 1963. exemplary push stead authorities and the AmericanTemperanceMovement. Urbana Universityof Illinois Press. -. 1967. chaste exit the symbolic process in public designationsof deviance. accessible Problems 15175-88. delinquencysocial history, political ideology, and Hagan, John, and Jeffery Leon. 1977. Rediscovering the sociologyof law. AmericanSociologicalReview42587-98. CreatingDevianceRules 169 Hawkins, Richard, and Gard Tiedman. 975. The intromission of Deviance. Columbus, Ohio Charles E. Merrill. Jenkins, J. Craig, and Charles Perrow. 1977. Insurgencyand the low-powered conjure prole movements (1946-1972). AmericanSociologicalReview42249-68. Lauderdale, vomit up, ed. 1980. A political abridgment of Deviance. MinneapolisUniversityof MinnesotaPress. , and pile Inverarity. 1980a. From apoliticalto political analysesof deviance. Pp. 15-44 in d isgorge Lauderdale,ed. , A semipolitical abstract of Deviance. MinneapolisUniversityof MinnesotaPress. . 1980b. Afterword suggestionfor the study of the political dimensionsof deviancedefinition. Pp. 221-37 in Pat Lauderdale, ed. , A political Analysisof Deviance. MinneapolisUniversityof Minnesota. Levine, rile Gene. 1978. The discoveryof colony changingconceptionsof habitual drink in America. Journalof Studieson alcoholic drink 39143-74. McCrea, Frances B. , and Gerald E. Markle. 1981. The estrogen replacementcontroversyin the United States and colossal Britain differentanswersto the same question? account presentedat the AnnualMeeting of the Societyfor the social Studiesof Science,Toronto. Mannheim, Karl. 1936. political theory and Utopia. Translatedby Louis With and Edward Shils. newly York Harcourt,Brace and World. Markle, Gerald E. , and James C. Petersen. 1980. authorities, Science, and crabby person The LaetrilePhenomenon. Boulder,Colo. WestviewPress. , 1981. Co ntroversiesin science and technology a protocol for comparativeresearch. Science Technologyand HumanValues 625-30. Markle, Gerald C. , and Ronald J. Troyer. 1979. mountain gets in your eyeball cigarettesmoking as deviant behavior. complaisant Problems26611-25. J. Mauss, ArmandL. 1975. complaisant Problemsas societal Movements. Philadelphia B. Lippincott. Sociology6602-606. . 1977. Reviewof social problemsbooks. coetaneous , and Julie Camile Wolfe. 1977. This estate of Promises. PhiladelphiaJ. B. Lippincott. of Neuhring, Elaine, and Gerald E. Markle. 1974. Nicotine and norms the re-emergence a deviant behavior. neighborly Problems21513-26. Oberschall,Anthony. 1973. affable Conflictand accessible Movements. EnglewoodCliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall. Pfohl, StephenJ. 1977. The discoveryof shaver abuse. mixer Problems24310-23. Platt, Anthony M. 1969. The peasant Savers The Inventionof Delinquency. loot Universityof bread Press. 1974. The triumphof beneficencethe originsof the juvenilejustice systemin the United States. -. Pp. 356-89 in RichardQuinney,ed. , CriminalJusticein America. capital of Massachusetts Little, Brownand Company. Ritzer, George. 1975. Sociology A MultipleParadigmScience. capital of Massachusetts Allyn and Bacon. Roby, Pamela A. 1969. authorities and criminallaw revisionof the impertinently York State penal law on prostitution. genial Problems1783-109. Rose, Vicki McNickle. 1977. The rise of the go against problem. Pp. 167-95 in ArmandL. Mauss and Julie CamileWolfe, eds. , This vote out of Promises. Philadelphia B. Lippincott. J. affectionate Schneider,Joseph W. 1978. deviant drinkingas unhealthiness alcoholismas a social accomplishment. Problems25361-72. Schur,EdwinM. 1980. The Politics of Deviance StigmaContestsand the Uses of Power. EnglewoodCliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall. Smelser, Neil J. 1962. Theory of CollectiveBehavior. bleak York Free Press of Glencoe. cordial Problems. Menlo Park, Calif. Cummings. Spector,Malcolm ,and John T. Kitsuse. 1977. Constructing Stinchcombe,ArthurL. 1978. TheoreticalMethodsin sociable History. New York AcademicPress. Robert G. Cushing,and CharlesG. Bowman. 1977. The antiZurcher,Louis A. , R. George Kirkpatrick, a pornography campaign symboliccrusade. Social Problems19217-38.